Allowed

Baidya Nath Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Dec 2022CR. MISC./49190/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case under Section 7 of the Estates Contract Act, directing him to furnish a bail bond within six weeks and submit a proper petition removing defects.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail in event of arrest on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties within six weeks subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Baidya Nath Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49190 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-203 Year-2022 Thana- CHANPATIA District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

BAIDYA NATH SAH Son of Gaya Sah Resident of Village - Pipra Naurangiya, P.S.- Yogapatti, District - West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

2 06-12-2022

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Gupta For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Parmeshwar Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects within four weeks.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 7 of the E.C. Act.

¶13

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is no specific overt act against the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner is a customer who bought the rice from the PDS dealer. Petitioner has no

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49190 of 2022(2) dt.06-12-2022 2/2

¶15

criminal antecedent.

¶16

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶17

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Chanpatiya/Srisiya (O.P.) P.S. Case No.203 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶18

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶19

shikha/-

¶20

U T

Baidya Nath Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baidya Nath Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alamgir Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Anarba Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Ramshohaban Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Prakash Gupta @Prakash Babu Vs The State of Bihar

Deepak Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shahid Jawed @ Shahid Jabed Vs the State of Bihar