Allowed

Dharmendra Kumar @Dharmendar Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Dec 2022CR. MISC./48859/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court ordered the release of the petitioner on bail in a POCSO case on the condition that the Additional Sessions Judge verifies if the victim and her child reside with him before accepting the bail bonds.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties, conditional on verification of victim's residence.

Dharmendra Kumar @Dharmendar Kumar Vs The State… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48859 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-467 Year-2020 Thana- NAUTAN District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

DHARMENDRA KUMAR @DHARMENDAR KUMAR Son of Arjun Sah R/V- Dhumnagar, Kachahari Tola, PS- Nautan, Dist- West Champaran

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 09-12-2022

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶13

learned counsel for the APP.

¶14

The petitioner is in custody since 13.07.2022 in connection with Srinagar Nautan P.S. Case No. 467 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 366(A), 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 8 of the POSCO Act.

¶15

A statement has been made in Paragraph 9 of this bail petition that the victim along with her minor child are staying with the petitioner.

¶16

In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48859 of 2022(2) dt.09-12-2022 2/2

¶18

learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI cum Special JudgePOCSO, Bettiah West Champaran in connection with Srinagar Nautan P.S. Case No. 467 of 2020.

¶19

While accepting the bail bond of the petitioner, the Court below will verify the fact whether the victim and her child are staying with the petitioner or not. If it is found that the victim and her child are staying with the petitioner then the Court below will accept the bail bond of the petitioner. If it is found that they are not staying with the petitioner then the bail bond of the petitioner shall not be accepted by the Court below.

¶20

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶21

Sunnykr/-

¶22

Dharmendra Kumar @Dharmendar Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharmendra Kumar @Dharmendar Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kumar Gaurav Vs The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary

Dr. Sunil Kumar Ray Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sunil Kumar Gupta Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dilip Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Gautam Koda @ Gautam Kora Vs The State of Bihar

Bittu Kumar @ Bittu Chaudhary @ Kireshwar Chaudhary @ Tilkeshwar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar