Partly allowed

Shailesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Jan 2022CR. MISC./47914/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners registered under various sections of the Penal Code, directing them to appear within twelve weeks and fix bonds after normalcy is restored, considering the COVID-19 pandemic situation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on personal bonds if arrested; directed to fix bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with sureties within eight weeks after normalcy is restored, and to remove defects within twelve weeks

Shailesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47914 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2021 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Shailesh Kumar S/O Ranjeet Chaudhary @ Nanka Chaudhary R/O VillageGolakpur, P.S- Ghosi, District-Jehanabad.

¶5

Sunil Chaudhary S/O Shankar Chaudhary R/O Village-Golakpur, P.S- Ghosi, District-Jehanabad.

¶6

Nitish Kumar S/O Deepak Chaudhary R/O Village-Golakpur, P.S- Ghosi, District-Jehanabad.

¶7

Sikandar Chaudhary S/O Gunni Chaudhary R/O Village-Golakpur, P.SGhosi, District-Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

¶16

ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 11-01-2022 Due to the third wave of COVID-19 Pandemic, the

¶18

matter is being taken up by way of Virtual Court proceeding.

¶19

The matter has been listed under the heading ‘For

¶20

Orders’ under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.

¶21

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy.

¶23

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47914 of 2021(2) dt.11-01-2022 2/3

¶25

case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 332, 353, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶26

The prosecution allegation, in short, is that on account of petty reason, accused persons assaulted on the head of Chowkidar and his son. .

¶27

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. General and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioners. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioners. The alleged occurrence is said to have taken place for a petty reason.

¶28

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

¶29

It is necessary to indicate here that this Court while considering the prayer made in the present anticipatory bail application has taken note of the exponential rise in number of covid cases due to outbreak of third wave of Covid-19 pandemic. Further this Court can also not lose sight of the fact that the condition of jails is not conducive and suitable to the present situation which has arisen due to the sudden rise in

¶30

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47914 of 2021(2) dt.11-01-2022 3/3

¶31

covid cases.

¶32

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on their personal bonds to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Ghoshi P.S. Case No. 115 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶33

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioners shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶34

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶35

Pankaj/-

¶36

U T

Shailesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shailesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tun Tun Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Roshan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Krishnakant Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Abhishek Kumar @ Chhotu Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar @ Amar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar