Allowed

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Sept 2022CR. MISC./47206/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in an excise case involving unloading illicit liquor. The court noted the petitioner was not present at the spot and had no criminal antecedents, ordering release upon furnishing a bond and sureties subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Order to release the petitioner on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of like amount.

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Sahni Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47206 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2021 Thana- CHACKMEHSI District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MUKESH KUMAR @ MUKESH SAHNI Son of Bhanty Sahni @ Bantun Sahni @ Rajesh Sahni R/v- Malinagar, P.S- Chakmehsi, Dist- Samastipur

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Chandra Shekhar Anand For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 16-09-2022

¶12

Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State in virtual court proceeding.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Excise G.R. No. 1066 of 2021 arising out of Chakmehsi P.S. Case No. 153 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018.

¶15

As per prosecution case, the informant alongwith his team was on patrolling duty and got a secret information that petitioner and others are unloading illegal liquor from the pickup van parked in front of house of co-accused Dharmendra Kumar to trade the illicit liquor. It is further alleged that after

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47206 of 2022(2) dt.16-09-2022 2/3

¶17

receiving the said information, informant and his team reached the place of occurrence and total 380.16 litre illicit liquor was recovered from the pickup van and motorcycle in question as well as from the land situated in front of house of co-accused Dharmendra Kumar. Petitioner and others are said to have fled away from the place of occurrence.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 18.05.2022 and bears no criminal antecedent. He further submits that neither petitioner was present at the place of occurrence nor was he arrested on the spot. No incriminating article has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner or from his house. Petitioner has no concern with the alleged pickup van and motorcycle in question.

¶19

The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioner, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47206 of 2022(2) dt.16-09-2022 3/3

¶22

of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge II cum Special Judge (Excise), Samastipur in connection with Excise G.R. No. 1066 of 2021 arising out of Chakmehsi P.S. Case No. 153 of 2021, subject to following conditions:-

¶23

(i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.

¶24

(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself.

¶25

(iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶26

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶27

shahzad/-

¶28

U T

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rita Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ravi Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Gautam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Kishore Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Roy @ Raju Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar