The High Court at Patna dismissed a bail application filed by Chanarik Mistry and Sunil Kumar as having become infructuous following their arrest during the pendency of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46969 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-669 Year-2020 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 15-06-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks from today.
Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the present application, the petitioners have been arrested and as such the present bail application has become infructuous and he seeks permission to withdraw the present bail application.
Accordingly, the present bail application stands
dismissed, as having become infructuous.
Learned APP for the State is present.
(Harish Kumar, J)
uday/-
U T
Chanarik Mistry, Sunil Kumar
The State of Bihar
Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
