Guddu Kumar @ Guddu Saw @ Guddu Prasad v. the State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Application dismissed as withdrawn since petitioner was already arrested and bail granted during pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46757 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2021 Thana- DANAPUR RPF POST District- Bhojpur
======================================================
Guddu Kumar @ Guddu Saw @ Guddu Prasad Son of Late Umesh Prasad Resident of Village- Bibiganj Tarigodam, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Bhushan, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 16-06-2022
Heard Mr. Amit Bhushan, leanred counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present application, the petitioner has been arrested and bail has been granted and as such, the present application has become infructuous. He seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Accordingly, the present application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Harish Kumar, J)
shakir/- U T
Guddu Kumar
The State of Bihar
HARISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court