Dismissed

Vedu Yadav @ Vedu Kumar @ Ved Prakash Yadav @ Sato Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Jun 2022CR. MISC./46463/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail application, the Patna High Court dismissed the plea. Despite the petitioner's lack of naming in the FIR and reliance on a confessional statement of another accused, the court refused bail due to the petitioner's extensive criminal antecedents involving more than eleven serious cases.

What did the court decide?

Application for anticipatory bail stands dismissed; petitioner is not liberated from arrest.

Vedu Yadav @ Vedu Kumar @ Ved Prakash Yadav @ Sato Yadav… — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46463 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2020 Thana- MANPUR District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vedu Yadav @ Vedu Kumar @ Ved Prakash Yadav @ Sato Yadav S/O Lakhan Yadav R/O Village-Korari, P.S-Deepnagar, District-Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 14-06-2022

¶13

Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar Chaudhary, learned counsel

¶14

for the petitioner and Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

¶16

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Manpur P. S. Case No. 02 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 457, 307, 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that this petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and his name has transpired on the confessional statement of one Rahul Kumar and except the confessional statement there is no

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46463 of 2021(2) dt.14-06-2022 2/2

¶19

material on record which suggests the complicity of this petitioner in the present case.

¶20

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has drawn the attention of this Court towards the criminal antecedent of this petitioner.

¶21

Having considered the fact that this petitioner has been found involved in more than eleven cases of serious nature, this court is not persuaded to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

¶22

Accordingly, the present application stands dismissed.

¶23

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶24

shakir/- U T

Vedu Yadav @ Vedu Kumar @ Ved Prakash Yadav @ Sato Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vedu Yadav @ Vedu Kumar @ Ved Prakash Yadav @ Sato Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arshad Malik @ Bholu @ Asgar Malik @ Asgar Ali @ Md. Asgar Ali Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Thakur @ Umesh Kumar Sharma Vs the State of Bihar

Ramchandra Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Nazre Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Ghun Mahato Vs the State of Bihar

Gaurav Kumar @ Guddu Vs the State of Bihar