Allowed

Rajendra Nirala v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 May 2022CR. MISC./46156/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, directing release upon arrest or surrender in PS Case No. 291 of 2020 involving IPC offences, subject to furnishing bonds and removing specific procedural defects within one month.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount upon arrest or surrender.

Rajendra Nirala Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46156 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-291 Year-2020 Thana- PIPRA District- Supaul

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAJENDRA NIRALA Son of Maniklal Mandal, Resident of VillageMahichanda Ward No. -3, P.S.- Pipra, District- Supaul, State- Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kuldeep Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 13-05-2022

¶13

The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within one month.

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Shailendra Kumar, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through video conferencing.

¶15

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 291 of 2020 registered for offence punishable under sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 447, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

As per allegation, the accused persons went to the land of the informant. They cut down two trees from there. The allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted Amit Ranjan

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46156 of 2021(2) dt.13-05-2022 2/2

¶18

Singh with farsa on his head.

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is case and counter case and previous land dispute between the parties. He has submitted further that the injuries are simple in nature and the petitioner is a person of clean antecedent.

¶20

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, within four weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Supaul in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 291 of 2020, subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

¶21

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time mentioned hereinabove, failing which, the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

¶22

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶23

Mahesh/-

¶24

U T

Rajendra Nirala v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra Nirala v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anita Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Upendra Kumar @ Upendra Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Purushotam Kahar Vs the State of Bihar

Vinoda Nand Tiwari @ Binoda Nand Tiwary Vs Dewa Nand Tiwary

Mubin Mohd. Yusuf Satopay @ Mubin Satopay Vs Kubendran Manikam Chettiar

Daulat Devi Vs the State of Bihar