Petitioner, in a criminal miscellaneous application concerning an earlier rejected bail application based on suppression, declines to press the matter as trial is near completion. The court dismisses the application as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45803 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-339 Year-2019 Thana- HISUWA District- Nawada
======================================================
PRASHANT KUMAR @ SANTU KUMAR @ SANTU Son of Anil Yadav Resident of village - Bhulan Bigha, Police Station - Hisua, District - Nawada.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
... ... Opposite Party/s
3 19-01-2022 This matter has been taken up today for consideration through video conferencing.
The fact of suppression in the bail application filed before the court of A.D.J.-V at Nawada, petitioner’s application was rejected by order dated 04.06.2021.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner today submits that he is under instructions that the trial is near completion. He, therefore, doesn’t wish to press this application.
This application is dismissed as not pressed.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
SUMIT/- U
Prashant Kumar
The State of Bihar
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
