Allowed

Chotu Kumar @ Chhetu Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar @ Manibhushan Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC30 Sept 2022CR. MISC./44527/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted bail to the petitioner accused of manufacturing and selling illicit liquor. The court noted the co-accused's imperfect witness status and directed release upon furnishing a bond and sureties under Section 437(3) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of like amount each.

Chotu Kumar @ Chhetu Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar @… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44527 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-438 Year-2021 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Chotu Kumar @ Chhetu Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar @ Manibhushan Kumar Yadav, Son Of Suraj Yadav @ Surya Narayan Yadav, R/O Village- Kasha, Tola- Latauna, Ward No.-2, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Madhav Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Pushpa Sinha.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 30-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through video conferencing.

¶11

Let the defect (s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks.

¶12

In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 438 of 2021 registered for the alleged offences under Section 290 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

¶13

Allegedly, total 121.14 litres of India made foreign liquor was recovered from the house of the co-accused. The coaccused who was apprehended from the spot, disclosed the name of the petitioner for being involved in the manufacture and

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44527 of 2022(2) dt.30-09-2022 2/3

¶15

sale of illicit liquor.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner was not apprehended from the spot and nothing incriminating has been recovered from his conscious possession. The co-accused confessed the name of the petitioner before the police who is on inimical term with this petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 22.05.2022 and the chargesheet has been submitted in this case.

¶17

Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail submitting that the petitioner has been made accused in one other case of similar nature.

¶18

Having regard to the submissions made hereinabove and considering the fact that the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot and no recovery has been shown from him and further considering the submission of charge-sheet along with his period of custody, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/(twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-2nd-cumSpecial Judge, Excise, Supaul in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 438 of 2021 subject to the conditions mentioned

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44527 of 2022(2) dt.30-09-2022 3/3

¶20

in Section 437(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also the following conditions :

¶21

(i) The bail bond of the petitioner will be accepted only after framing of charge, if not already framed.

¶22

(ii) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶23

(iii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

¶24

(iv) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

¶25

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶26

balmukund/-

¶27

U T

Chotu Kumar @ Chhetu Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar @ Manibhushan Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chotu Kumar @ Chhetu Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar @ Manibhushan Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pritam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Golu Kumar @ Vishal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Hari Narayan Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Deepak Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sagar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pramod Rai @ Pramod Kumar Vs The State of Bihar