Upon permission to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 21(1) of the Patna High Court rules, the learned single judge allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the application.
Permission to withdraw the application was accorded; the application is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44278 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2019 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Lakhisarai
======================================================
ASHOK KUMAR Son of Chandradeo Singh Resident of Village - 532, Walipur, P.S.- Pipariya, Distt.- Lakhisarai, Bihar- 811311.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Deo Prakash Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 21-11-2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to
remove the defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw this application.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this application stands dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/- U T
Ashok Kumar
The State of Bihar
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
