Allowed

Chhote Kumar @ Chhotu Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Nov 2022CR. MISC./43469/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order granting bail to the petitioner in a charge sheeted loot case involving a motorcycle. The court applied a lenient approach considering reliance on co-accused statements, recovery of loot from others, lack of T.I.P., and antecedents. Bail granted with bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Chhote Kumar @ Chhotu Paswan Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43469 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-165 Year-2021 Thana- TILAUTHU District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Chhote Kumar @ Chhotu Paswan S/O Dharmendar Paswan R/O VillageJamalpur, P.S.- Nasriganj, District- Rohtas

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shankar Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Sada Nand Ray, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar No.3, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 24-11-2022

¶11

The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to

¶12

remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

¶14

Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Tilauthu P.S. Case No. 165 of 2021 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per the prosecution, the informant’s motorcycle was looted by some unknown miscreants.

¶16

The main submissions advanced by the learned counsel Mr. Shankar Kumar appearing for the petitioner are that the alleged looted motorcycle was recovered from the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43469 of 2022(2) dt.24-11-2022 2/3

¶18

possession of the co-accused Amit Kumar @ Chandan Kumar and Ravi Kumar as per the prosecution and during the course of investigation the petitioner was made accused mainly on the basis of statement of co-accused Birju Gosai but looted motorcycle was not recovered from the possession of this petitioner and after his arrest he was not put on Test Identification Parade and against him there is a criminal antecedent of one case in which he has been granted bail by the Court below. Further submission is that one co-accused Amit Kumar from whose possession the motorcycle was recovered has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order passed in Cr. Misc No.19292 of 2022.

¶19

Learned APP Mr. Binod Kumar No.3 appearing for the State has opposed the bail prayer.

¶20

Heard both the sides and perused the FIR and order Impugned. The Instant matter relates to loot committed by four unknown persons in respect of a motorcycle of the informant. The order impugned goes to show that the petitioner was made accused mainly on the basis of confessional statement of coaccused Birju Gosai and the said order also shows that the looted motorcycle was recovered from the possession of coaccused persons and not from the possession of this petitioner

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43469 of 2022(2) dt.24-11-2022 3/3

¶22

and the petitioner has taken the plea that after his arrest he was not put on Test Identification Parade by the Police. Considering these facts as well as petitioner’s custody period, in the opinion of this Court a lenient approach can be taken in respect of the petitioner’s prayer, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court in connection with Tilauthu P.S. Case No. 165 of 2021.

¶23

(Shailendra Singh, J.)

¶24

murli/-

¶25

U T

Chhote Kumar @ Chhotu Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chhote Kumar @ Chhotu Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manohar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Arif Ekbal @ Rakesh Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Yadav @ Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjan Kumar Singh @ Rajan Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Pawan Raj @ Pawan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar