Allowed

Hira Mahto v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Aug 2022CR. MISC./4175/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted bail to the petitioner, a truck cleaner charged with transporting illicit liquor under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The court fixed bail amount and conditions including sureties and attendance requirements, distinguishing the petitioner from the driver who had already been granted bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of like amount, subject to conditions in Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

Hira Mahto Vs the State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4175 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1019 Year-2021 Thana- AGAMKUAN District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Hira Mahto, Son of Kripal Mahto, Resident of Kartika Tea Garden, P.S. - Samokhtulla, District - Jalpaiguri (W.B.)

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 16-08-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

Let the defect (s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from the date of resumption of physical filing and physical removal of defect.

¶15

In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Special Case No. 6962 of 2021, arising out of Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 1019 of 2021 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 30(a), 32 (3) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

¶16

As per prosecution case, total 7173 litres of India made foreign liquor was recovered from a truck and co-accused driver, namely Suresh and this petitioner, who is stated to be the cleaner of the said truck, have been apprehended from the spot.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4175 of 2022(3) dt.16-08-2022 2/3

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is merely a cleaner and he has no knowledge about the consignment being carried on the truck. The petitioner is not involved in any manner in sale and purchase of the liquor and he is a poor person doing the work of cleaner (khalasi) to earn his livelihood. The co-accused driver has been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.05.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 5277 of 2022. The petitioner is in custody since 28.10.2021 and charge-sheet has been submitted.

¶19

Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail submitting that the huge quantity of illicit liquor has been recovered from the truck and the petitioner and other co-accused were apprehended from the said truck.

¶20

Having regard to the submissions made hereinabove and considering the submission of charge-sheet along with period of his custody, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Patna in connection with Special Case No. 6962 of 2021, arising out of Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 1019 of 2021, subject to the condition mentioned in Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C. and also

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4175 of 2022(3) dt.16-08-2022 3/3

¶22

other following conditions:

¶23

(i) One of the bailors will be Punam Kheroyar,

¶24

wife of the petitioner, who has sworn the affidavit.

¶25

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

¶26

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates

¶27

or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

¶28

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶29

Rajnish/-

¶30

U T

Hira Mahto v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hira Mahto v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandan Gupta @ Chandrabhushan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Karan Kumar Bansfor @ Karan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bipin Kumar @ Bipin Kumar Sharma Vs the Central Bureau of Investigation (C.B.I.)

Shailesh Rai @ Shailesh Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Mintu Yadav @ Mantu Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Vs the State of Bihar