Allowed

Hajrat Ansari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Nov 2022CR. MISC./41461/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application regarding a dowry death case, the Patna High Court allowed bail to the petitioner, a father-in-law alleged to have participated in the deceased's murder, considering his clean antecedents and separate residence.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000/- and two sureties upon furnishing conditions of cooperation and non-tampering.

Hajrat Ansari Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41461 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-227 Year-2022 Thana- BAGHA District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

HAJRAT ANSARI Son of Late Sahid Ansari Resident of Village - Patkhauli, P.s.- Bagaha (Patkhauli), Distt.- West Champaran.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s ======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the State : Mr.Bharat Bhushan For the Informant Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary Mr. Dhananjay Kumar ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 17-11-2022 Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be

¶10

removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

¶12

counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bagaha (Patkhauli) P.S. Case No. 227 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

As per prosecution case, petitioner and others are alleged to have committed the murder of informant’s daughter for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 05.04.2022 and bears no criminal

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41461 of 2022(2) dt.17-11-2022 2/3

¶17

antecedent. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner rather the same is general and vague. He further submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case being father-inlaw of the deceased. He further submits that petitioner being father-in-law of the deceased resides separately since several years back from the family of the deceased and her husband. He further submits that petitioner is separate from mess and property and there is no interference by the petitioner in the family affairs of the deceased and her husband. He further submits that charge sheet has been submitted in the case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence.

¶18

Learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State oppose the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioner, petitioner being father-in-law of the deceased is residing separately and has no concern with the family affairs of the deceased and her husband, as submitted, charge sheet has been submitted in the case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41461 of 2022(2) dt.17-11-2022 3/3

¶21

material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1st, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Bagaha (Patkhauli) P.S. Case No. 227 of 2022, subject to following conditions:-

¶22

(i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.

¶23

(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself.

¶24

(iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶25

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶26

shahzad/-

Hajrat Ansari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hajrat Ansari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohit Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Mithun Mandal @ Mithun Kumar Mandal @ Mithun Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ramji Singh Kharbar Vs The State of Bihar

Mukund Kumar Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Ramji Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Naga Rai @ Nandlal Rai Vs The State of Bihar