Allowed

Rahul Yadav @ Rahul Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Nov 2022CR. MISC./41133/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences, including attempted murder and hurt. The court considered the petitioner's clean antecedents and the simple nature of injuries as factors for release on bail bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each.

Rahul Yadav @ Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41133 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-203 Year-2021 Thana- BENIPATTI District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAHUL YADAV @ RAHUL KUMAR S/O BHORIL YADAV Resident of Samda, P.S.- Benipatti, District- Madhubani (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jagdish Prasad Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 07-11-2022

¶13

The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to

¶14

remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the state.

¶16

Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Benipatti P.S Case No. 203 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 354(A), 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

As per the prosecution, the informant has alleged that while he was sitting near a pond his co-villager Bhoril Yadav came there and started saying that you people sit here for fishing and pushed him in the pond and snatched his mobile and when the incident was taken before the Panchayat he accepted the

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41133 of 2022(2) dt.07-11-2022 2/3

¶19

decision of Panchayat but later on refused to obey it. Further it is alleged that this petitioner with fifteen other co-accused persons armed with weapons (Farsa, Dabiya etc.) arrived at the house of the informant and started abusing him, thereafter on command of Bhoril Yadav this petitioner and co-accused Sujit Yadav attacked on the informant’s brother’s head and injured him and when the informant came to safeguard his brother coaccused Bhoril Yadav injured him on his head by means of Tengari, thereafter the informant’s family members were also assaulted by the accused persons and they also snatched some gold and silver articles.

¶20

The main submissions advanced by the learned counsel Mr. Jagdish Prasad Singh appearing for the petitioner are that the alleged offence of section 307 of the Indian Penal Code is not made out against the petitioner, and the injuries found on the person of the injured namely, Subodh Yadav are not corroborative to the nature of the allegation made against the petitioner in the FIR and the petitioner has clean antecedent and languishing in jail since 24.03.2022.

¶21

Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶22

In view of the above submissions and mainly

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41133 of 2022(2) dt.07-11-2022 3/3

¶24

considering the petitioner's clean antecedent and his young age mentioned in his petition and also the fact that as per the FIR the petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the informant's brother named Subodh Yadav by means of Farsa but the injuries found on the person of the said injured have been opined to be caused by hard and blunt object and the same has been opined to be simple in nature also, hence in my view, the petitioner deserves to a lenient approach of this Court, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Learned A.C.J.M 1^st Benipatti at Madhubani in connection with Benipatti P.S. Case No. 203 of 2021.

¶25

(Shailendra Singh, J)

¶26

annu/-

¶27

U T

Rahul Yadav @ Rahul Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Yadav @ Rahul Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vimla Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Mustafa Devan Vs The State of Bihar

Vinay Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Vikki Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Yadav @ Dabo @ Dhobo @ Dhoka Vs The State of Bihar