Allowed

Viveka Yadav @ Bikwa v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC29 Aug 2022CR. MISC./40264/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 regarding recovery of wine, the High Court of Patna granted bail on furnishing a bond and sureties, subject to standard conditions of appearing in court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail on bond of Rs. 30,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 437(3) CrPC and undertaking to appear in trial.

Viveka Yadav @ Bikwa Vs the State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40264 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-376 Year-2020 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL District-

¶3

Begusarai

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Viveka Yadav @ Bikwa Son of Pallat Yadav R/o- Vill- Raghunathpur, P.S.Sahebpur Kamal, District- Begusarai

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajkumar Rajesh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 29-08-2022

¶12

Let the defect, if any, be removed within two weeks from today.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No. 376 of 2020 lodged under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, total recovery of 306 litres English Wine alleged to be made in this case.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not apprehended from the place of occurrence. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 13.11.2021 having clean antecedent.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40264 of 2022(2) dt.29-08-2022 2/2

¶18

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for

¶19

bail.

¶20

In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, let the petitioner above named, be granted bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise Court, Begusarai in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No. 376 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. with other following conditions:

¶21

A. The petitioner shall support in trial and shall appear physically before the lower court on each and every date fixed, in case of non-appearance for two consecutive dates without sufficient cause, shall resulted into cancellation of his bail bond.

¶22

B. One of the bailor shall be close relative who shall file affidavit before the court about his relation with the petitioner.

¶23

With this observation, the bail application stands allowed.

¶24

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶25

sadique/-

¶26

U T

Viveka Yadav @ Bikwa v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Viveka Yadav @ Bikwa v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bittu Sah @ Bitu Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Durga Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Naresh Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Basant Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Bablu Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Bipin Mandal Vs The State of Bihar