Allowed

Jitendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Jan 2022CR. MISC./39401/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner, Jitendra Yadav, in a BNS/Excise case involving illicit liquor. The Court emphasized the petitioner was neither the truck owner nor driver, had no criminal antecedents, and co-accused had already been released on bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with bond of Rs. 20,000 and two sureties to the Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum Special Judge, Excise, Madhubani.

Jitendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39401 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2021 Thana- PHULPARAS District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

JITENDRA YADAV Son of Mahavir Yadav Resident of Village- Ramnagar, P.S.- Ghoghardiha, District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 22-01-2022

¶11

Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the

¶12

petitioner and Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State through video conferencing.

¶13

Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Phulpras P.S. Case No. 70 of 2021 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30 (A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

¶14

The Police on the basis of secret information proceeded towards the place of occurrence and found that two trucks were standing near the Dhaba and upon seeing the Police party the person standing near the truck started fleeing away. The petitioner along with five others were arrested and a total quantity of 4635.360 litres of illicit liquor has been recovered from both the trucks and a co-driver Rishikant Baghel was also

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39401 of 2021(2) dt.22-01-2022 2/3

¶16

arrested.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case by the Police with oblique motive and he has not committed any offence in the manner alleged inasmuch as he had gone for a cup of tea in the Dhaba and was arrested by the Police. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he is neither the owner nor the driver of the trucks from which the illicit liquor was recovered. He next submits that no illicit liquor has been recovered either from conscious possession of the petitioner or from the vehicle belonging to him.

¶18

The petitioner is in custody since 10.02.2021 and coaccused persons i.e., Rishikant Bhagel @ Rishikant Bansal and Babloo Kumar Yadav @ Babloo Kumar have been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. Nos. 32591 & 35359 of 2021, respectively.

¶19

Regards being had to the submission made by the parties and taking into consideration the materials on record, the fact that the petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the truck, he is in custody since 10.2.2021 having no criminal antecedent and similarly situated co-accused persons have been

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39401 of 2021(2) dt.22-01-2022 3/3

¶21

granted bail by this Court, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

¶22

Accordingly, let the petitioner, JITENDRA YADAV, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/(Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum Special Judge, Excise at, Madhubani, in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 70 of 2021.

¶23

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶24

perwez

¶25

U T

Jitendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mithun Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Bharat Yadav @ Ram Bharath Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajeev Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Dharmendra Kumar Singh @ Dharmendra Singh @ Khekhar Vs the State of Bihar