Allowed

Nazim @ Md. Nazim v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Nov 2022CR. MISC./39095/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought bail in a theft and criminal breach of trust case. The High Court granted bail on individual bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions regarding court attendance and evidence tampering.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioners on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions of attendance and non-tampering.

Nazim @ Md. Nazim Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39095 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2022 Thana- HARLAKHI District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

NAZIM @ MD. NAZIM SON OF SRI ASHLAM NADAF R/O VILLAGEBETA PARSA, P.S.- HARLAKHI, DISTRICT- MADHUBANI

¶5

DILKASH NADAF SON OF JAHIR NADAF R/O VILLAGE- BETA PARSA, P.S.- HARLAKHI, DISTRICT- MADHUBANI

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar BIHAR

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gagandeo Yadav, Adv. Mr.Ravi Prakash, Adv. Mr.Vinod Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.APP. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 14-11-2022

¶13

Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be

¶14

removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶16

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Harlakhi P.S. Case No. 49 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

As per prosecution case, informant’s motorcycle was not found at the place where he had parked his motorcycle. It is alleged that the petitioners were allegedly found with the motorcycle in question and they were apprehended with the said motorcycle.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39095 of 2022(2) dt.14-11-2022 2/3

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are in custody since 21.02.2022 and bear no criminal antecedent. He further submits that petitioners have no concern with the stolen motorcycle. He further submits that it was matter of overtaking of bike between the informant and petitioners and due to that hot exchange of words took place between them resulting false implication of the petitioners in the present case.

¶20

The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioners, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Benipatti, Madhubani in connection with Harlakhi P.S. Case No. 49 of 2022, subject to following conditions:-

¶22

(i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39095 of 2022(2) dt.14-11-2022 3/3

¶24

(ii) Petitioners will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself.

¶25

(iii) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶26

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶27

shahzad/-

¶28

U T

Nazim @ Md. Nazim v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nazim @ Md. Nazim v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Golu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sheo Kumar Singh and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Anjay @ Ranjan Singh @ Ajay Singh @ Ajay Kumar Singh @ Ranjay Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Shailendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeev Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Hira Lal Yadav Vs The State of Bihar