Allowed

Santosh Ram v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Mar 2022CR. MISC./39066/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single authored oral order granting regular bail to two petitioners charged with murder under Section 302 IPC. The court allowed the bail application against the State's opposition, directing release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate XV, Vaishali.

Santosh Ram Vs the State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39066 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2021 Thana- KARTAHA District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Santosh Ram S/O Harendra Ram R/O Village-Ghataro Purani Pethiya, P.SKartahan, District-Vaishali.

¶5

Mangun Ram @ Manganu Ram S/O Bhudhan Ram R/O Village-Ghataro Purani Pethiya, P.S-Kartahan, District-Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Bela Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.G. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 10-03-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

¶13

State.

¶14

The petitioners pray for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 302 and other ancillary sections of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, FIR named accused persons including the petitioners are suspected to have killed informant’s son. It is alleged that in past accused persons had threatened the informant’s of dire consequences.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion. Informant is not the eye witness of the occurrence. No substantive evidence has been collected during course of investigation to suggest the implication of this petitioners in the present case. Petitioners have claimed clean

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39066 of 2021(3) dt.10-03-2022 2/2

¶18

antecedent and are in custody since 21.3.2021 and 22.3.2021.

¶19

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioners is allowed. Let both the petitioners, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate XV, Vaishali at Hajipur in Kartahan Police Station Case No. 3 of 2021.

¶21

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶22

shashi/-

Santosh Ram v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Ram v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mangal Kumar Sah @ Anmol Kumar Sah @ Anmol Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Kusum Devi @ Kusumkali Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Banti Kumar @ Ghanti @ Bantee Kumar @ Ghanti Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Panna Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar