Disposed
Krishna Singh v. The State of Bihar
Patna HCCR. MISC./3850/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3850 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2021 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 326, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3850 of 2022(2) dt.13-07-2022 2/3
Code.
The allegation against the petitioners is that they along with other accused persons have indiscriminately assaulted the informant and his nephew by means of various deadly weapons.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. It is submitted that the alleged occurrence took place on 02.02.2021 but the fardbeyan of the informant has been recorded on 08.02.2021 and the FIR has been instituted on 10.02.2021 i.e. after a delay of eight days, without assigning any plausible explanation. It creates doubt about the prosecution case. Petitioners have criminal antecedents, as mentioned in para-3 of this application and similarly situated co-accused have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 11.07.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No.57454 of 2021.
Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3850 of 2022(2) dt.13-07-2022 3/3
since similarly situated co-accused have been enlarged on bail, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No.39 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
pallavi/-
U T
KRISHNA SINGH AND ORS.
THE STATE OF BIHAR
ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court