Allowed

Sonu Sharma @ Sonu Seema v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Dec 2022CR. MISC./37974/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner liable for arrest under multiple IPC sections. The petitioner undertook to remove defects within three weeks, failing which the matter would be placed before the Bench. Bail was granted on furnishing a bond with sureties under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of the like amount within six weeks, subject to removal of defects.

Sonu Sharma @ Sonu Seema Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37974 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-261 Year-2020 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sonu Sharma @ Sonu Seema Son Of Bashisht Sharma Resident Of VillageGorthaha, Badhai Tola, Ward No. 4, Police Station- Harsidhi, District- East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prateek Tandon For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Bharat Lal ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 06-12-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

¶14

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 447, 341, 323, 354 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Petitioner along with other accused person are said to have assaulted the informant and his son by means of lathi as a result of which she sustained injury.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37974 of 2022(3) dt.06-12-2022 2/2

¶18

case due to land dispute. He submits that the injury found upon the victim is simple in nature. Earlier, petitioner was granted regular bail by the learned court below but after investigation the police has submitted charge-sheet under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

¶19

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

¶20

bail.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 261 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶23

devendra/-

¶24

U T

Sonu Sharma @ Sonu Seema v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonu Sharma @ Sonu Seema v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alamgir Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Anarba Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Ramshohaban Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Prakash Gupta @Prakash Babu Vs The State of Bihar

Deepak Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shahid Jawed @ Shahid Jabed Vs the State of Bihar