Patna High Court ordered regular bail for the petitioner in a police station case involving burglary, extortion, and an arms offense, requiring a non-refundable bond of Rs. 20,000 and two sureties.
Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37591 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2021 Thana- HASPURA District- Aurangabad
======================================================
KAMLESH YADAV Son of Laldev Yadav Resident of Village- Birhara Tola Chaman Bigha, P.S.- Haspura, District- Aurangabad
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Umesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered u/s 379, 384 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.
As per the prosecution case, the informant received information on call that two unknown miscreants entered his rice mill forcibly and gave a letter demanding Rs Five lakh as levy and also fired on the ground which caused a stone to hit the shoulder of one of his labourers. The miscreants also took away informant's mobile set containing two SIM cards.
2/2
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37591 of 2022(2) dt.12-10-2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that
the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the name of the petitioner has surfaced in the self-statement of the petitioner recorded in Haspura P.S. Case No. 85 of 2021 and the petitioner was remanded in this case after nine months. No T.I.P. has been conducted by the prosecution. The co-accused person has already been granted bail vide order dated 08.09.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 28399 of 2022 by a Coordinate Bench. The petitioner is accused in two other criminal cases as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 09.09.2021.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Daudnagar, District-Aurangabad in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 85 of 2021.
The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner deserves to be granted regular bail in a case under sections 379, 384 IPC and 27 of the Arms Act.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
KAMLESH YADAV
The State of Bihar
CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
