Allowed

Varis @ Waris Ahmad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 May 2022CR. MISC./36384/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court granted bail to Varis @ Waris Ahmad, Tarik @ Tariq, and Sagar Kumar, accused in a robbery case under Sections 392 and 412 IPC. The court held that lack of physical evidence and TIDP rendered further detention unwarranted.

What did the court decide?

Appellants released on bail on executing PR bond of Rs. 10,000 each with surety, subject to specific conditions regarding conduct and cooperation.

Varis @ Waris Ahmad Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36384 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2021 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Varis @ Waris Ahmad, Son of Iliyas, Resident of Village - Laliyana, P.S. - Kithore, District - Meerut (Uttar Pradesh)

¶5

Tarik @ Tariq, Son of Saffi, Resident of Village - Asilpur, P.S. - Kithore, District - Meerut (Uttar Pradesh)

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

with

¶12

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 18947 of 2022

¶13

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2021 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad

¶14

====================================================== Sagar Kumar, Son of Subodh Kumar, R/O Village- Utar Bazar, Warsaliganj, P.S.- Warsaliganj And District- Nawada

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶19

====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 36384 of 2021) For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Leelawati Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Lal, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 18947 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nilendu Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. M. BADAR ORAL ORDER

¶20

4 16-05-2022 These applications are preferred by applicants, Varis

¶21

@ Waris Ahmad, Tarik @ Tariq and Sagar Kumar, who are accused in Crime No. 32 of 2021 registered with Madanpur Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 392 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. They are claiming bail after filing of the charge sheet.

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36384 of 2021(4) dt.16-05-2022 2/4

¶23

Heard both sides.

¶24

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the

¶25

application by submitting that the accused persons have confessed the crime.

¶26

I have considered the submission so advanced. I have also perused the material placed before me including the counter affidavit filed by the Investigating Officer.

¶27

FIR of the subject crime is lodged on the basis of report of Parshuram Rana, driver of the truck transporting 250 quintal sugar. He reported that in the night of 01.02.2021 when he as well as his conductor were sleeping after parking the truck, the miscreants came and took them in custody and dumped them in another four-wheeler vehicle. Those robbers then took away the truck driven by him. After some time, he as well as his conductor were thrown out of the another fourwheeler vehicle within territorial jurisdiction of Amas Police Station.

¶28

Evidence against the applicants comprises of confessional statements. Nothing was recovered from the applicants. They were not subjected to Test Identification Parade. In this view of the matter, after conclusion of the investigation further pretrial detention of the applicants is not

¶29

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36384 of 2021(4) dt.16-05-2022 3/4

¶30

warranted. Therefore, the order :-

¶31

i. The application is allowed.

¶32

ii. The applicants/accused in Crime No. 32 of 2021 registered with Madanpur Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 392 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code be released on bail on executing P.R. bond of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand) each on furnishing surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court with the following conditions: -

¶33

(I) The applicants/accused should not extend any threat, promise of inducement to the persons acquainted with the facts of the accusation against them so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.

¶34

(II) The applicants/accused should cooperate the trail court in expeditious disposal of the trial against them.

¶35

(III) The applicants/accused should not contact the members of the prosecuting party as well as witnesses in this case in any manner till conclusion of the trial.

¶36

(IV) The applicants should not repeat commission of similar offence in future and if they are found to be involved in commission of similar offence, the State is at liberty to apply for cancellation of bail granted to the applicants

¶37

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36384 of 2021(4) dt.16-05-2022 4/4

¶38

in the instant case.

¶39

The applicants to remove all office objections forthwith and the Registry to issue the certified copy of this order only after removal of office objections by the appellants/accused.

¶40

Bhardwaj/- (A. M. Badar, J)

¶41

U T

Varis @ Waris Ahmad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Varis @ Waris Ahmad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Awadhesh Yadav @ Awadhesh Singh @ Awadesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Amar Kumar @ Amit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Driver MD Rizwan @ MD Rizwan Vs The State of Bihar

Sagar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Pandey Vs the Central Bureau of Investigation (C.B.I), New Delhi

Ram Krishna Jha Vs Central Bureau of Investigation (C.B.I.), New Delhi