Partly allowed

Harender Singh v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Jan 2022CR. MISC./36232/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order withdraws the petition for Harender Singh as infructuous due to his arrest. It grants anticipatory bail to petitioner nos. 2 and 3, who are named in an FIR for serious offences but lack specific accusations, directing their release upon arrest or surrender within eight weeks upon furnishing bail bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petition by petitioner no. 1 dismissed as infructuous. Petition by petitioner nos. 2 and 3 allowed with direction to release them on bail upon arrest or surrender within eight weeks.

Harender Singh Vs the State of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36232 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-265 Year-2020 Thana- DARIYAPUR District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

HARENDER SINGH SON OF LATE RAM SAKAL SINGH R/O VILLAGE- SAMASPURA, P.S.- DARIPYAPUR, DIST.- SARAN

¶5

BITESHWAR KUMAR @ BITESHWAR SINGH SON OF HARENDRA SINGH R/O VILLAGE- SAMASPURA, P.S.- DARIYAPUR, DIST.SARAN

¶6

GOLU KUMAR SON OF HARENDRA SINGH R/O VILLAGESAMASPURA, P.S.- DARIYAPUR, DIST.- SARAN

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shiva Shankar Prasad Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

2 22-01-2022

¶12

Heard Mr. Shiv Shankar Prasad Singh, the

¶13

learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for

¶14

the State.

¶15

Mr. Singh seeks permission to withdraw the petition with respect to the petitioner no. 1, who has been arrested during the pendency of this petition.

¶16

The petition with respect to the petitioner no. 1/

¶17

Harender Singh is dismissed as having become infructuous.

¶18

The petitioner nos. 2 and 3 seek bail in anticipation

¶19

of their arrest in connection with Dariyapur P.S. Case No.

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36232 of 2021(2) dt.22-01-2022 2/3

¶21

265 of 2020 dated 06.08.2020 instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 302, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶22

The accusation in the FIR is that one person was killed whereas another was severely injured.

¶23

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that 35 persons have been named in the FIR including him and about 10 to 15 unnamed persons are also alleged to have committed the occurrence. Some of the accused persons have been specifically attributed with the weapons of assault and overt act of killing one person and injuring another. So far as the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are concerned, except for their being named in the FIR there is no other accusation against them.

¶24

The learned counsel for the petitioners has further submitted that one of the co-accused persons of this case, namely, Uday Singh @ Uday Kumar has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 20.12.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 8479 of 2021. Other accused persons, similarly situated have also been granted bail by the

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36232 of 2021(2) dt.22-01-2022 3/3

¶26

different Benches of this Court vide order dated 17.09.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 5108 of 2021 and order dated 24.11.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 5744 of 2021.

¶27

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner nos. 2 and 3, are directed to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before he Court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sonepur, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 265 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal

¶28

Procedure Code.

¶29

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶30

sunilkumar/-

¶31

U T

Harender Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harender Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmvir Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Arman Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary

Raj Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Akhilesh Kumar Singh @ Akhilesh Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Vikas Chandra Acharya @ Vikash Chandra Acharya Vs the State of Bihar

Smt Parbati Kumari Vs the State of Bihar