Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 5.1.2021, is person with clean antecedent and charge sheet has been submitted. Learned senior counsel submits that the informant in the FIR alleges that he along with his brother had gone for morning walk when four unknown accused persons on two motorcycles intercepted and shot his brother dead, further the informant can identify the accused persons. Learned senior counsel submits that FIR was against unknown and name of the petitioner surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused Chottu Sah and the petitioner after his arrest confessed his guilt before the police, learned senior counsel submits that confession before the police is not admissible in evidence, it is further submitted that though the informant claimed in the FIR that he can identify the accused persons but petitioner despite being arrested was never put on TI parade. Learned counsel further submits that from perusal of the statement of the informant recorded at para 29 of the case diary, it would manifest that this petitioner was known to the informant from before, as informant has given detailed description of the petitioner along with his family members. Thus, it is submitted that since petitioner was known to the informant and if the petitioner would have committed the
