Allowed

Allauddin Mian @ Gahnu Miya v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Oct 2022CR. MISC./34019/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma allowed the bail application of the petitioner in a criminal case involving assault and criminal intimidation, permitting release on bail bond with standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount subject to conditions of court attendance and non-interference with evidence.

Allauddin Mian @ Gahnu Miya Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34019 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2021 Thana- SAKURABAD District- Jehanabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Allauddin Mian @ Gahnu Miya Son Of Late Chamru Miya Resident of village- Uchita, Police Station- Shakurabad District- Jehanabad

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 14-10-2022

¶13

Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be

¶14

removed within four weeks of starting of Court proceeding in physical mode in normal course.

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State in the virtual Court proceeding.

¶16

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence under Sections 341,323,308 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

The prosecution case, in brief, is that while the informant was irrigating his field, in the meantime, the petitioner has assaulted the informant by means of spade as a result of which the informant sustained head injury and when the informant’s Gotini came there to rescue, she was also assaulted.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34019 of 2022(2) dt.14-10-2022 2/3

¶20

that the petitioner has clean antecedent. He has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioner has also lodged an FIR against the informant and there is admitted land dispute between the parties, due to land dispute, the informant implicated the petitioner in the false and fabricated case with malafide intention to harass the petitioner and the police, after investigation, submitted chargesheet against the petitioner under Sections 341,323,307,504 of the Indian Penal Code and the petitioner is in custody since 23.04.2022.

¶21

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶22

Considering the fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Shakurabad P.S.Case No.36 of 2021 with the following conditions:-

¶23

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34019 of 2022(2) dt.14-10-2022 3/3

¶25

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶26

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶27

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶28

Nitesh/-

¶29

U T

Allauddin Mian @ Gahnu Miya v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Allauddin Mian @ Gahnu Miya v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmendra Mahato Vs The State of Bihar

Rupesh Sharma Vs the State of Bihar

Vishal @ Vishal Choubey Vs the State of Bihar

Chhotu Alias Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shail Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Kahar Dom Vs the State of Bihar