Binod Kumar Himanshu @ Binod Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
This order rejects a regular bail plea because the petitioner absconded on the date of the judgment. It further directs the return of original lower court records to the trial court, retaining only a photocopy at the High Court based on a Standing Committee resolution.
What did the court decide?
Bail rejected; original lower court records directed to be returned to the trial court.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32641 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2003 Thana- SURYAGARHA District- Lakhisarai
======================================================
BINOD KUMAR HIMANSHU @ BINOD YADAV S/O CHANDRADEO YADAV R/o village- Chananiya, P.S.- Surajgarha, District- Lakhisarai
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikram Deo Singh, Adv. Mr. Shankar Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
5 05-04-2022
Heard Mr. Vikram Deo Singh, learned counsel for
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted to a petitioner who absconded on the date of the trial court's judgment.
Whether the original lower court records should be retained in the High Court when the trial is still pending inconclusively.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Binod Kumar Himanshu @ Binod Yadav
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Anil Kumar Sinha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court