Partly allowed

Abhishek Kumar @ Sintu Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Dec 2022CR. MISC./32635/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this oral order, the Patna High Court granted interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences. The Court observed that no specific overt act was alleged against him and directed the grant of bail if he surrenders or is arrested within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on arrest or surrender within six weeks, furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties of similar amount.

Abhishek Kumar @ Sintu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32635 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-320 Year-2019 Thana- EKANGARSARAI District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Abhishek Kumar @ Sintu Kumar Son Of Ashok Kumar Resident Of VillageEkangar Sarai, P.S.- Ekangar Sarai In The District- Nalanda, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR.

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 13-12-2022 Heard both sides.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Ekangar Sarai P.S. Case No.320 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 387 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The petitioner and other co-accused are said to have

¶16

demanded Rs.2000/- from the informant. When the informant denied, he was assaulted by the petitioner and other co-accused persons.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner has got one criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail application. It is further submitted that no specific overt act is alleged against the

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32635 of 2022(3) dt.13-12-2022 2/2

¶19

petitioner and the allegations are general and omnibus.

¶20

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶21

Considering the fact that no specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner, let petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Ekangar Sarai (Nalanda) in connection with Ekangar Sarai P.S. Case No.320 of 2019, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶22

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶23

Sanjay/-

¶24

U T

Abhishek Kumar @ Sintu Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abhishek Kumar @ Sintu Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shashikant Kumar @Chhotu Vs The State of Bihar

Vikram Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Gandhi @ Dhananjay Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Faizan Vs The State of Bihar

Seema Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar