The High Court granted permission to withdraw a quashing application, allowing the petitioner to raise issues during the framing of charge and discharge proceedings.
Permission to withdraw the quashing application granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3183 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2017 Thana- NAUHATTA District- Rohtas
======================================================
VISHWANATH YADAV Son of Late Ghutur Yadav Resident of Village - Devipur, P.S. - Nauhatta, District - Rohtas (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh No.10, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
A.P.P. for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, arguing vehemently for sometime, seeks permission to withdraw the present quashing application.
Permission is accorded, the petitioner is given liberty to raise all the issues raised in the present quashing application at the time of framing of charge and the learned trial court while deciding the discharge application shall pass a reasoned order.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Shivam/-
U T
Vishwanath Yadav
The State of Bihar
Fulmati Devi
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
