Allowed

Ravi Kumar Paswan @ Ravi Kumar Pasamva v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Jun 2022CR. MISC./3171/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In bail application under Section 439 CrPC (implied), the Hon'ble High Court released the petitioner on bail subject to furnishing a bond and compliance with specific conditions regarding close relatives, appearance, and consequences of violation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount on specified conditions.

Ravi Kumar Paswan @ Ravi Kumar Pasamva Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3171 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2021 Thana- GAYA RPF/POST District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ravi Kumar Paswan @ Ravi Kumar Pasamva Son of Vinod Paswan, R/O - Badki Delha Vijay Bigha, P.S.- Delha, District- Gaya

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Renu Kumari, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 06-06-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

Let the defect (s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today, if any.

¶14

In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gaya R.P.F. P.S. Case No. 19/21 registered for the alleged offences under Section 3 of R.P. (U.P.) Act.

¶15

The allegation against the petitioner is to have committed theft of railway property.

¶16

It has been submitted by the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he is in custody since 10.09.2021. The petitioner is an accused in another case, i.e., Gaya R.P.F. Case

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3171 of 2022(2) dt.06-06-2022 2/2

¶18

No.18/21 under Section 3 of R.P. (U.P.) Act, but learned counsel for the petitioner is not aware about the status of the said case as to whether he is on bail or not.

¶19

However, considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 10.09.2021 for charges of stealing the railway property, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Gaya R.P.F. Post P.S. Case No.19 of 2021, subject to the following conditions :

¶20

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, preferably one of his parents.

¶21

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

¶22

(iii) In case of absence for three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

¶23

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶24

V.K.Pandey/-

¶25

U T

Ravi Kumar Paswan @ Ravi Kumar Pasamva v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Kumar Paswan @ Ravi Kumar Pasamva v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narad Sahani @ Narad Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Sathi Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Panamatiya Devi Vs The State of Bihar