Allowed

Md. Gyassuddin v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Sept 2022CR. MISC./31666/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a liquor case. The release was conditional on furnishing bonds and ensuring trial cooperation despite the petitioner's criminal antecedents and the allegedy inconsistent recovery of alcohol.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioner on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and compliance with conditions regarding trial attendance and criminal antecedent verification.

Md. Gyassuddin Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31666 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-422 Year-2020 Thana- CHAPRA TOWN District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Gyassuddin Son Of Anwar R/O Village- Mathauli Bazar, P.S.Kaptanganj, District- Kushinagar (U.P.)

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pawan Kumar, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 02-09-2022

¶14

Let the defects, if any, be removed within four weeks from today.

¶15

A Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner bringing on record that due to inadvertence in para-3, the correct position could not be mentioned. However, he submits that the petitioner is named in six other criminal cases and he seeks apology for the same.

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through video conferencing.

¶17

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered in connection with Chapra Town P.S.Case No. 422 of 2020 for

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31666 of 2022(2) dt.02-09-2022 2/4

¶19

the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 41 (I) (ii) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

¶20

It is alleged that on confidential information, the petitioner was apprehended and on search 15 liters country made liquor was recovered near the house of Vyas Raj.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged recovery has been made near the house of Vyas Raj and the same does not belong to the petitioner. He further submits that only because of his past criminal antecedent, he has been apprehended by the police. He next submits that there is no compliance of section 100 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in as much as, there is no independent witness to support the prosecution case. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 10.08.2020 and after completion of the investigation, charge sheet has been submitted.

¶22

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposed the bail application of the petitioner and submits that he has multiple criminal antecedent.

¶23

Having heard the rival contentions of the parties and taking into consideration that the alleged recovery has

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31666 of 2022(2) dt.02-09-2022 3/4

¶25

been made near the house of Vyas Raj and the petitioner is in custody since 10.08.2020, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II Saran in connection with Chapra Town P.S.Case No. 422 of 2020 subject to the condition as follows-

¶26

(i) One of the bailors will be the local resident of the territorial jurisdiction of this court.

¶27

(ii) The petitioner will cooperate in conclusion of

¶28

the trial.

¶29

(iii) He will remain present on each and every date of trial till disposal of the case.

¶30

(iv) He will not try to tamper with the evidence or intimidate the witnesses to delay the disposal of trial.

¶31

(v) In the event of default of two consecutive dates

¶32

without any cogent reason, his bail bonds will liable to be cancelled.

¶33

(vi) The Court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage, it is

¶34

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31666 of 2022(2) dt.02-09-2022 4/4

¶35

found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancelling of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above- mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶36

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶37

N.K/-

¶38

U T

Md. Gyassuddin v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Gyassuddin v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Sonu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Bhikhan Pal Vs The State of Bihar

Kanhai Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kumbh Karan Chaudhary Vs the State of Bihar

Lalan Sahni Vs The State of Bihar