submits that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and the First Information Report has been lodged after a delay of one month. He further submits that the victim girl was recovered by the police and her statement, under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, was recorded in which she has stated that she had met with one Reena Devi and said Reena Devi sent her along with one Constable Vikram, who committed rape upon her and handed her over to one Ruby Devi and subsequently Ruby Devi brought her to the petitioner at Gaya and after staying there for one week, said Ruby Devi again took the victim girl to village Pachati, Bodhgaya and handed over the victim girl to Constable Vikram, who again committed rape upon her and prepared indecent video also and on 06.01.2021, the victim girl fled from there and went before the petitioner and after staying there for about 10-15 days, when the victim girl was returning back, co-accused Constable Vikram again caught her and kept her before a dancer. He further submits that from perusal of the statement of the victim girl, recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, it would be evident that she has not stated anything against the petitioner and after fleeing from the captivity of Constable Vikram, she had herself came before the petitioner
