Dismissed

Md. Sahid @ Sahid Pradhan @ Sahid Reza v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC29 Mar 2022CR. MISC./3086/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Patna, in a bail application under Section 438 CrPC, refused regular bail to the petitioner due to criminal antecedents and multiple pending cases. The court ordered the petitioner's release on bail only upon its satisfaction once charges are framed.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for regular bail refused; accused to be released on bail when charges are framed if the court is satisfied.

Md. Sahid @ Sahid Pradhan @ Sahid Reza Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3086 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-447 Year-2020 Thana- KISHANGANJ District- Kishanganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MD. SAHID @ SAHID PRADHAN @ SAHID REZA Son of Late Md. Din Ali @ Late Md. Ali Resident of Dhanigachh, Sonapur, P.S.- Chopra, DistrictUttar Dinajpur (West Bengal).

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar ====================	... ... Opposite Party/s ==================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s :	Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate and Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : ====================	Mr.Nityanand, Addl Public Prosecutor ==================================
CORAM: HONOURABL	E MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 29-03-2022

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶10

The petitioner prays for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 420 and other allied sections of the IPC and sections 30a and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶11

As per the prosecution case, about 8641 liters of foreign liquor was recovered from the truck and two persons were arrested on the spot who disclosed that the petitioner had supplied the said liquor.

¶12

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that no incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicle in question. He is in

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3086 of 2022(2) dt.29-03-2022 2/2

¶14

custody since 9.10.2021.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that 10 criminal cases of similar nature are pending against the petitioner.

¶16

Considering the rival submissions of the parties and criminal antecedent of the petitioner, prayer for bail of the petitioner is refused.

¶17

However, the court in seisin of the matter shall release of the petitioner on bail to its own satisfaction as and when charge is framed in the case.

¶18

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶19

shashi/-

Md. Sahid @ Sahid Pradhan @ Sahid Reza v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Sahid @ Sahid Pradhan @ Sahid Reza v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyama Kant Ojha @ Shyama Kant Ojh @ Pappu Ojha Vs the State of Bihar

Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Golu Pathak Vs the State of Bihar

Shubham Kumar Singh @ Shubham Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Bijay Bishwas Vs The State of Bihar

Bhatan @ Bhatan Kora @ Bhagtan Kora Vs The State of Bihar