This court granted bail to the petitioner in a robbery case under Section 392 IPC. The petitioner was directed to furnish a bond and was required to cooperate in the trial, subject to conditions regarding antecedents and evidence tampering.
Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30809 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2021 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL DistrictBegusarai
======================================================
Shiva Yadav, Son of Namdhari Yadav, Resident of Village- Kumar Chakki, P.S.- Muffasil (Khagaria), Dist- Khagaria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sabal Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 01-09-2022
Heard Mr. Sabal Kumar Jha, learned counsel
appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State.
Let the defect(s) be removed within two weeks of the complete start of the physical Court in normal course.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with S.Kamal P.S. Case No. 125 of 2021, for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the allegation made in the F.I.R. four persons on the point of pistol looted cash of Rs. 84,000/-, gold chain and mobile phone of the informant.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case on the confessional statement made by one co-accused Hira
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30809 of 2022(2) dt.01-09-2022 2/3
Yadav. He further submitted that the looted amount has been recovered from one Brajesh Kumar, who has already been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.04.2022 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 60729 of 2021. He further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner nor from any of his family members. The petitioner is in custody since 22.12.2021, but he has not been put on Test Identification Parade (T.I.P).
Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation made against the petitioner and period of custody, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M-4, Begusarai in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No. 125 of 2021, subject to the following conditions:-
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30809 of 2022(2) dt.01-09-2022 3/3
properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence, after his release on bail, the trial Court shall take steps to cancel his bail bonds.
(5) The court below is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases as what has been stated in paragraph No.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically loose its force.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
manish/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner entitled to be enlarged on bail in a case for robbery and theft.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shiva Yadav
The State of Bihar
Purnendu Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
