Allowed

MD Ashlam @ Raja @ MD Aslam v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Sept 2022CR. MISC./30385/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter, the Patna High Court granted bail to a petitioner accused of narcotics offenses under the NDPS Act and Arms Act, allowing release upon furnishing bail bonds with two sureties and adherence to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 25,000 plus two sureties of the like amount each, subject to standard conditions.

MD Ashlam @ Raja @ MD Aslam Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30385 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2022 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR TOWN DistrictMuzaffarpur

¶3

====================================================== MD ASHLAM @ RAJA @ MD ASLAM SON OF MD AYUB RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- KALIBARI ROAD, P.S- MITHANPURA, DISTMUZAFFARPUR.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raju Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Lalan Kumar ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 14-09-2022

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 45/2022 arising out of Town P.S. Case No. 88/2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 8(c), 21(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985.

¶13

As per prosecution case, there is alleged recovery of one live cartridge and 20 packets of 300 mg. each total 60 gm. smack like substances from the possession of the petitioner.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. No incriminating articles has been recovered from the

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30385 of 2022(3) dt.14-09-2022 2/3

¶16

possession of the petitioner or the house of the petitioner. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 30.01.2022 and bears no criminal antecedent. Seizure list has not been prepared as per law. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that alleged recovered quantity is less than commercial quantity as per notification of N.D.P.S. Act. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence.

¶17

The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶18

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, argument advanced on behalf of both sides, charge sheet has already been submitted in this case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence and keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioner and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-1, Muzaffarpur in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 45/2022 arising out of Town P.S. Case No. 88/2022, subject to following conditions:-

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30385 of 2022(3) dt.14-09-2022 3/3

¶20

(i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.

¶21

(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself.

¶22

(iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶23

(iv) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences in future, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

¶24

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶25

amitkumar/-

¶26

U T

MD Ashlam @ Raja @ MD Aslam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

MD Ashlam @ Raja @ MD Aslam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Das Vs The State of Bihar

Saurabh Kumar @ Monu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Monu Kumar @ Monu Sarkar Vs The State of Bihar

Ramu @ Ramekbal Kumar @ Ramakabal Kumar @ Ramval Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Paplesh Kumar @ Paplesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Birendra Paswan Vs The State of Bihar