Dismissed

Md. Mahiuddin @ Md. Moiuddin v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Dec 2022CR. MISC./302/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted permission to the petitioners to withdraw Criminal Miscellaneous No. 302 of 2022 while preserving the liberty to raise all issues at an appropriate stage in future proceedings. The application was consequently dismissed as withdrawn with the said liberty.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the application with liberty to raise all points at the appropriate stage.

Md. Mahiuddin @ Md. Moiuddin Vs The State of Bihar — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.302 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-548 Year-2020 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Mahiuddin @ Md. Moiuddin S/O Late Kutubuddin

¶5

Md. Raish S/O Moiuddin @ Md. Mahiuddin

¶6

Md. Matin S/O Moiuddin @ Md. Mahiaddin

¶7

Nusrat Bano W/O Md. Raish All R/O Rahmat Nagar, Ward No.04, P.S-Madhubani T.O.P., District-Purnea.

¶8

Mustaqueen @ Md. Mustaqueen S/O Pichru R/O Ward No.8, Muslim Tola, Baraita, P.S-Kasba, District-Purnea.

¶9

Md. Wais Alam @ Waeef @ Jivchha S/O Moiuddin @ Mahiaddin

¶10

Bibi Sabina Khatoon @ Sabina Khatoon W/O Md. Moiuddin @ Md. Mahiaddin

¶11

Afsana Khatoon W/O Amser

¶12

Gul Afsa Khatoon @ Gul Afsana W/O Md. Isa

¶13

Md. Isa S/O Md. Alimuddin Petitioner Nos.6 to 10 R/O Rahmat Nagar, Ward No.04, P.S-Madhubani T.O.P., District-Purnea.

¶14

... ... Petitioner/s

¶15

Versus

¶16

The State of Bihar

¶17

Umesh Rishi S/O Late Mistry Lal Rishi R/O Village-Rahmat Nagar, Ward No.04, P.S.-K.hat (Madhubani T.O.P.), District-Purnea (bihar).

¶18

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶19

======================================================

¶20

Appearance :

¶21

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bijendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Binay Krishna, Spl.P.P.

¶22

======================================================

¶23

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶24

2 01-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶25

A.P.P. for the State.

¶26

Let the defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any,

¶27

be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶28

After some arguments learned counsel for the

¶29

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.302 of 2022(2) dt.01-12-2022 2/2

¶30

petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to raise all points at the appropriate stage.

¶31

Permission is accorded.

¶32

Accordingly, this application stands dismissed as

¶33

withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶34

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶35

Nitesh/-

¶36

U T

Md. Mahiuddin @ Md. Moiuddin v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Mahiuddin @ Md. Moiuddin v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sandeep Prasad Baranwal @ Sandeeep Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Aditya Kumar @ Satyam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Karan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Bablu @ Sahid Ali Vs The State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Amirul Vs The State of Bihar

Shailesh Kumar Singh @ Shailesh @ Shailesh Sachidanad Sigh and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.