Dismissed

Bhola Singh @ Sanjeev Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Feb 2022CR. MISC./29742/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court rejected the bail application of Bhola Singh, who was in custody since September 2019. The court noted that only one witness was examined. It directed the trial court to conclude the trial within twelve months, permitting a bail renewal only if significant progress is not made. Bail was not enlarged at this stage.

What did the court decide?

The bail application was rejected. The trial was directed to be concluded within twelve months.

Bhola Singh @ Sanjeev Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29742 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-275 Year-2019 Thana- PAKRIDAYAL District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

BHOLA SINGH @ SANJEEV KUMAR Son of Late Manoj Singh Resident of Village- Ajgarwa, P.S.- Pakridayal, District- East Champaran.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anuj Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dhannjay Kumar No 2 Mr. Amit Kumar Rakesh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH

¶8

ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 08-02-2022 Heard the parties through video conferencing.

¶10

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶11

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within two weeks of the complete start of the physical Court in normal course.

¶12

The petitioner, who is in custody since 06.09.2019, seeks regular bail in connection with Pakridayal P.S. Case No. 275 of 2019 for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 302 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 27.08.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 12900 of 2020.

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29742 of 2021(3) dt.08-02-2022 2/2

¶15

The trial court vide its Letter No. 337 dated 22.12.2021 has reported that one witness has been examined and summons against rest of the witnesses have been issued.

¶16

Considering the stage of trial, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage.

¶17

Accordingly, the present bail application is rejected. The trial court is directed to conclude the trial in view of his Letter No. 337 dated 22.12.2021 within a period of twelve months from today.

¶18

If no substantial progress takes place in the trial within the aforesaid period, the petitioner, if so advised, may renew his prayer for bail.

¶19

(Purnendu Singh, J)

¶20

mantreshwar/-

¶21

U T

Bhola Singh @ Sanjeev Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhola Singh @ Sanjeev Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhruv Kumar Mandal @ Dhruv Mandal @ Uday Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Khurshid Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Mustak @ Dukhan Mian Vs The State of Bihar

Amar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chander Gope @ Chandra Gop Vs the State of Bihar

Vishal Kumar Vs the State of Bihar