Allowed

Rohit Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Jul 2022CR. MISC./2699/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Granting bail to Rohit Kumar in a kidnapping attempt case involving a minor victim, the High Court relied on clean antecedents, the victim's habit of lodging false cases, the absence of sexual assault allegations, and the completion of the investigation.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 310 of 2021 on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satis

Rohit Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2699 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-310 Year-2021 Thana- KHARHAGPUR District- Munger

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rohit Kumar Son of Shyam Sundar Singh @ Shyam Sundar Mandal Resident of Village - Pokari, P.S. - Haveli Kharagpur, District - Munger.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 20-07-2022

¶13

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶14

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶15

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 310 of 2021 registered for the offence under Sections 366(A), 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 27.09.2021.

¶17

The allegation against the petitioner is to kidnap the informant/victim, who is minor, alongwith other co-accused persons, for the purpose of illicit intercourse.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the victim is habitual of lodging such type of

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2699 of 2022(3) dt.20-07-2022 2/3

¶20

cases, as it appears from the bare perusal of the F.I.R. It is submitted, as alarm was raised by the villagers at the time of occurrence, the victim/informant was rescued by police, as such, the maximum allegation, which appears to be suggestive, is of attempt for the alleged offence. It is also submitted that there is no allegation of sexual assault, as per the statement of victim, recorded u/s 164 of Cr.P.C. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that petitioner is a man of clean antecedent and, moreover, investigation in this case is complete for which chargesheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

¶21

Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State, while opposing the prayer of bail, fairly conceded that there is no allegation of sexual assault, as per statement of victim recorded u/s 164 of Cr.P.C.

¶22

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as there is no allegation of sexual assault coupled with the fact that chargesheet has already been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 310 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2699 of 2022(3) dt.20-07-2022 3/3

¶24

learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Munger, DistrictMunger/concerned Court, subject to the following conditions:

¶25

“(i) Accused/Petitioner shall

¶26

cooperate in the trial and shall be physically present on each and every date before the Trial Court till conclusion of the trial and exemption from physical appearance be allowed by the Trial Court, only on medical ground of the petitioner, duly supported by the documents.

¶27

(ii) That one of the bailors shall be Shyam Sundar Singh @ Shyam Sundar Mandal, who is the father of the petitioner and deponent of the present bail petition.”

¶28

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶29

Ankit/-

¶30

U T

Rohit Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhay Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Avinash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rama Shankar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Ashok Yadav Vs The State of Bihar