Permission to withdraw criminal miscellaneous application was granted; the application is subsequently dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal principle is laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26665 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-175 Year-2022 Thana- AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAurangabad
======================================================
RASINDAR PASWAN S/o Late Tulsi Paswan R/o village- Murgi Bigha, P.S.Aurangabad Town, District- Aurangabad (Bihar)
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shailesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pushpa Sinha.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
2 16-09-2022 At the outset, It is submitted by learned counsel for
the petitioner that he seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Permission is accorded.
This application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
sushma/aman
U
Pasindar Paswan
State of Bihar
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
