Allowed

Krishnadev Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Nov 2022CR. MISC./26479/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allowed bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under IPC Sections 272, 273 and Bihar Excise Act Section 30(a) for possession of illicit wine, directing release if apprehended within thirty days upon furnishing bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount if he arrests or surrenders within thirty days.

Krishnadev Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26479 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-157 Year-2021 Thana- KALUAHI District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Krishnadev Yadav Son of Ram Sewak Yadav R/O Village - Balua Tole, P.S.Kaluahi, District - Madhubani

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pushpa Sinha.1, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 02-11-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

¶15

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30 (a) of Bihar Excise (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2018.

¶16

Recovery is of 39 liters of illicit wine.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶18

petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the recovery has been made from the main road and in fact, the

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26479 of 2022(2) dt.02-11-2022 2/3

¶20

petitioner is the owner of the motorcycle in question and the motorcycle was standing near the place of recovery but he has no concern at all of the alleged recovery and he was not apprehended. He further submits that petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery and only on the basis of the suspicion the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case.

¶21

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Kaluahi P.S. Case No. 157 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and with other following conditions:-

¶23

Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26479 of 2022(2) dt.02-11-2022 3/3

¶25

sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶26

If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶27

And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶28

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶29

vanisha/-

¶30

U T

Krishnadev Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishnadev Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Shahbaj Alam @ Shahbaj @ Rounak Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Kumar Raut Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Kumar @ Tinku Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Pukar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Morindra Sah @ Munindra Sah Vs the State of Bihar