Allowed

Vishwa Singh @ Vishwamohan Singh @ Bishamohan Singh @ Vyas Singh @ Mochu v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Sept 2022CR. MISC./26058/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted bail to the petitioner in a Prohibition case involving illicit spirit. The petitioner was released conditionally after charges were framed, providing a bail bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail after framing of charge by furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of like amount each.

Vishwa Singh @ Vishwamohan Singh @ Bishamohan… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26058 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2021 Thana- INDUSTRIAL AREA District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

VISHWA SINGH @ VISHWAMOHAN SINGH @ BISHAMOHAN SINGH @ VYAS SINGH @ MOCHU Son of Ganesh Singh Resident of Village - Banauta, P.s.- Dariyapur, Distt.- Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dewendra Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Surendra Kumar

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 01-09-2022

¶14

Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶16

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Industrial Area P.S. Case No. 83/2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273, 420, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 33, 36, 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶17

As per prosecution case, there is alleged recovery of total 5717 liters raw spirit from truck in question. Apprehended co-accused, Anish Kumar disclosed the name of petitioner and other who were involved in the alleged supply of illicit spirit.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26058 of 2022(2) dt.01-09-2022 2/3

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner was not apprehended on the spot and nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Except confessional statement of co-accused, Anish Kumar Vidarthi nothing on record to demonstrate the complicity of the present petitioner with the alleged occurrence. The petitioner has neither concerned with the said truck nor concerned with the seized spirit. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 27.01.2022 and bears criminal antecedent of one case of similar nature in which he is on bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that charge sheet has been submitted in this case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence. He further submits that coaccused, Anish Kumar Vidarthi @ Pappu who was apprehended on the spot, has already been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No.53493/2021 and the case of present petitioner stands on better footing.

¶20

The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, petitioner was not apprehended on the spot,

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26058 of 2022(2) dt.01-09-2022 3/3

¶23

charge sheet has already been submitted and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.-1 cum Additional Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Industrial Area P.S. Case No. 83/2021, subject to following conditions:-

¶24

(i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.

¶25

(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself.

¶26

(iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶27

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶28

amitkumar/-

¶29

U T

Vishwa Singh @ Vishwamohan Singh @ Bishamohan Singh @ Vyas Singh @ Mochu v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishwa Singh @ Vishwamohan Singh @ Bishamohan Singh @ Vyas Singh @ Mochu v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Sahani Vs the State of Bihar

Kailash Sahni Vs the State of Bihar

Kampu Paswan Vs the State of Bihar

Babli Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Kumari Devi @ Mst. Raj Kumari Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Gorelal Yadav Vs The State of Bihar