Pintu Kumar v. the State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
This order addresses an application for anticipatory bail in a prohibition and forgery case involving 149.4 liters of wine. The High Court, noting that 86.4 liters were recovered from the petitioner's house, rejected the plea of false implication and denied bail.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail prayer rejected due to substantial recovery of illicit liquor from the petitioner's house.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25900 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2021 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran
======================================================
PINTU KUMAR Son of Sri Nagendra Ray Resident of Village - Baburabani, P.S.- Sonepur, Distt.- Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanchay Srivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar No.1, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
2 22-01-2022
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a fake implication case involving 149.4 liters of wine.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Pintu Kumar
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Sunil Kumar Panwar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court