Allowed

Md. Javed Pamaria @ Md. Javed v. State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Aug 2022CR. MISC./2588/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted anticipatory bail to petitioners apprehending arrest in a case involving sections 341, 323, 324, and 307/34 IPC. Bail was allowed subject to conditions within four weeks of arrest or surrender.

What did the court decide?

Release on anticipatory bail within four weeks of arrest or surrender on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of the like amount.

Md. Javed Pamaria @ Md. Javed Vs State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2588 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-437 Year-2021 Thana- LAHERIYASARAI District- Darbhanga

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MD. JAVED PAMARIA @ MD. JAVED Son of Wahid Pamaria @ Md. Wahid @ Md. Vahid Resident of Village - Rahamganj Pamaria Tola, P.S.Laheriasarai, Distt.- Darbhanga.

¶5

Md. Nezam Son of Late Bhikhari Resident of Village - Rahamganj Pamaria Tola, P.S.- Laheriasarai, Distt.- Darbhanga.

¶6

Abbas @ Md. Abbas Son of Abdul Hamid Resident of Village - Rahamganj Pamaria Tola, P.S.- Laheriasarai, Distt.- Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Girish Chandra Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amit Kumar Rakesh, APP ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 01-08-2022

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

¶17

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

It is a case of assaulting due to which the informant sustained injury.

¶19

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that from perusal of the injury report of Annexure-3, it appears that all injuries are simple in nature.

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2588 of 2022(2) dt.01-08-2022 2/2

¶21

Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Darbhanga in connection with Laheriasarai P.S. Case No. 437 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶23

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶24

Brajesh Kumar/-

¶25

U T

Md. Javed Pamaria @ Md. Javed v. State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Javed Pamaria @ Md. Javed v. State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Himanshu Kumar @ Happy Vs The State of Bihar

Din Nath Ram @ Dinanath Ram @ Chotu Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Munna Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Vikas Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ramji Singh @ Ramji Paneri Vs The State of Bihar

Rama Shankar Singh Vs the State of Bihar