Allowed

Naresh Sahani v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC28 Jun 2022CR. MISC./2571/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court permitted petitioner to remove defects and subsequently granted bail, directing cooperation in trial and specifying conditions including a relative surety and verification of antecedents. Petitioner sought bail after nearly a year in custody for liquor possession.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on Rs.20,000 with two sureties including a relative; restrictions to appear in trial and not tamper with witnesses; verification of antecedents ordered.

Naresh Sahani Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2571 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-2020 Thana- KHANPURA District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Naresh Sahani, Son of Narayan Sahani, Resident of Village- Teleghara, Police Station- Khanpur, District- Samastipur.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 28-06-2022

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks from today.

¶11

Heard Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks regular bail, who is in custody in connection with Khanpur P.S. Case No. 179 of 2020 for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶13

As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on secret information the police raided the house of this petitioner and it is alleged that from a hut total 15 litres of country made liquor was recovered.

¶14

It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that from perusal of the seizure list it is

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2571 of 2022(2) dt.28-06-2022 2/4

¶16

evident that the alleged recovery has been made from a hut, which is not a dwelling house and moreover there is no compliance of the provisions prescribed under Section 100 of the Cr.P.C. It is further submitted that the petitioner was neither arrested at the spot nor any incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of this petitioner and so far the hut is concerned that was an abandoned hut. It is also submitted that this petitioner is in custody since 25.08.2021, though investigation of the crime is complete and the chargesheet has been submitted and as such keeping the petitioner behind the bar would not serve the purpose.

¶17

On the other hand, learned APP for the State opposes the bail application and submits that this petitioner has been found involved in a similar nature of case. In response to the aforesaid submission, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is on bail in the aforesaid case.

¶18

Having considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that the alleged recovery has been made from a hut, which was said to be an abandoned and not the dwelling house of the petitioner, inasmuch as the petitioner is in custody since 25.08.2021 and the investigation is already completed and the charge-sheet has

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2571 of 2022(2) dt.28-06-2022 3/4

¶20

already been submitted, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cumSpecial Judge, Excise Act, Samastipur in connection with Khanpur P.S. Case No. 179 of 2020 subject to the condition that one of the bailors will be the close relatives of the petitioner with further conditions which are as follows:-

¶21

(i) The petitioner will cooperate in conclusion of the trial.

¶22

(ii) He will remain present on each and every date of trial till disposal of the case.

¶23

(iii) He will not try to tamper with the evidence or intimidate the witnesses to delay the disposal of trial.

¶24

(iv) In the event of default of two consecutive dates without any cogent reason, his bail bonds will liable to be cancelled.

¶25

(v) The court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case, at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancelling the bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds, in terms of

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2571 of 2022(2) dt.28-06-2022 4/4

¶27

the above-mentioned order, shall not be delayed for this purpose

¶28

or in the name of verification.

¶29

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶30

uday/-

¶31

U T

Naresh Sahani v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naresh Sahani v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Mishra @ Manoj Kumar Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Shivlal Rathore Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Yadav @ Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Vilash Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Kanhaiya Sahni Vs The State of Bihar