Dhiraj Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order dismissing bail petition of prisoner charged under Arms Act. Court rejected bail due to prima facie evidence of running illegal arms factory despite lack of direct recovery from petitioner.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25629 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-213 Year-2020 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL District-
Begusarai
======================================================
DHIRAJ YADAV Son of Sujeet Yadav Resident of Village - Dandari Tola Lakhminiya, P.S.- Ballia, Distt.- Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikram Deo Singh, Advocate Mr.Sada Nand Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Asha Kumari, A.PP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
... ... Opposite Party/s
8 11-02-2022 Heard the parties through video conferencing.
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing for the State.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant regular bail to the petitioner charged with offences under the Arms Act considering the recovery of illegal arms and his custody.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dhiraj Yadav
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Purnendu Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court