Chandradeo Yadav v. the State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Held that the petitioner cannot be granted bail as he is the husband of the deceased and cannot exonerate himself from the death of his wife.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected; petitioner remains in judicial custody.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25513 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-252 Year-2021 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya
======================================================
CHANDRADEO YADAV Son of Vishu Yadav @ Bishun Yadav Resident of Village - Modanbigha (meyari Tola) , P.s.- Fatehpur, Distt.- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Onkar Nath, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
2 11-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in the heinous offence of murder under Sections 302/34 IPC.
Whether the petitioner, being the husband of the deceased, can be granted bail in a murder case despite his inability to deny the death.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Chandradeo Yadav
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Rajiv Roy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court