Dismissed

Rajesh Singh @ Rajesh Kumar @ Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Aug 2022CR. MISC./24906/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal bail matter concerning murder and arms charges, the High Court refused to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The court noted the trial's delay despite previous directives but found the defence's petition to recall the Investigating Officer a sufficient ground to deny bail while directing an expedited conclusion of the trial.

What did the court decide?

The application for bail was rejected; the trial court was directed to conclude the trial expeditiously.

Rajesh Singh @ Rajesh Kumar @ Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24906 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2019 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAJESH SINGH @ RAJESH KUMAR @ SINGH S/o Ram Narayan Singh R/o village- Khamhar, P.S.- Mufasil, District- Begusarai

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arjun Prasad, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Atul Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 24-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶10

The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail in a

¶11

case registered under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶12

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have fired hitting Neeraj Kumar in his chest as a result of which he fell and died.

¶13

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the earlier application for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 02.08.2021 (Annexure-1) passed in Cr. Misc. no.32866 of 2020 wherein taking note of the fact that only the Investigating Officer of the case remained to be examined, this Court had directed to expeditiously conclude the trial within six

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24906 of 2022(3) dt.24-08-2022 2/2

¶15

months. Inspite of more than one year having passed the trial has still not concluded and as such it is prayed that the petitioner who is in custody since 8.3.2019 be enlarged on bail.

¶16

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶17

As per the report received contained in letter dated

¶18

13.7.2022 of the Additional District Judge-I-cum-Special Judge, NDPS Act, Begusarai, a petition has been filed by the defence on 4.7.2022 for recalling P.W.6 Ambika Prasad, Investigating Officer of the case for further cross examination.

¶19

In view of the allegation against the petitioner together with the contents of the report received from the learned trial Court from which it transpires that it was the defence who has filed a petition for recall of the Investigating Officer of the case for further cross- examination, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

¶20

Learned trial Court is directed to expeditiously conclude the trial.

¶21

Bibhash/-

¶22

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶23

Rajesh Singh @ Rajesh Kumar @ Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Singh @ Rajesh Kumar @ Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

New India Sugar Mills Limited Vs Union of India

The Union of India Vs Rajeev Ranjan

Gita Devi and Ors. Vs Duniya Prasad Singh

Chitanand Dwivedi @ Chida Nand Dwivedi Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Azaharuddin Ali @ Azaharuddin Vs The State of Bihar

Abhiram Mishra @ Gogan Mishra @ Gogan Vs The State of Bihar