Single Judge Oral Order dismissing an application for anticipatory bail. The court denied relief due to the petitioner's criminal antecedents of a similar nature under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24183 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-576 Year-2021 Thana- DARIYAPUR District- Saran
======================================================
Anil Rai S/o Yogendra Ray R/o- Village Mangarpal, P.S. - Dariyapur, District Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Manish Chandra Gandhi, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Dariyapur P.S. Case No.576 of 2021 registered for offences under Sections 30, 30(a) and 33 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
Considering the fact that the petitioner has criminal antecedents of similar nature, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to him. This application for anticipatory bail is dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
BT/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail shall be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
ANIL RAI
STATE OF BIHAR
SANDEEP KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
