Allowed

Sundaram Chaudhary @ 4G v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Jul 2022CR. MISC./2278/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought bail in an arms offence case where the charge sheet was submitted. The High Court ordered the petitioner's release on bail after the framing of charges, subject to furnishing a bond and meeting specific mandatory conditions regarding sureties and conduct during the trial.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail after framing of charge, bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of attendance and non-tampering.

Sundaram Chaudhary @ 4G Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2278 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-422 Year-2021 Thana- SURSAND District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sundaram Chaudhary @ 4g Son of Rajiv Ranjan @ Rajiv Chaudhary Resident of Village- Maidan, P.S.- Sursand, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Umanath Mishra ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 18-07-2022

¶12

Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sursand P. S. Case No. 422/2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a and 26 of the Arms Act.

¶15

As per prosecution case, there is alleged recovery of one loaded country made pistol alongwith one live cartridge from the pocket of the petitioner. The petitioner was apprehended on the spot.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 11.09.2021

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2278 of 2022(3) dt.18-07-2022 2/3

¶18

and bears criminal antecedent of four cases in which two are of similar nature. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence.

¶19

The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, charge sheet has already been submitted in this case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail after framing of charge , on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Pupri, Sitamarhi in connection with Sursand P. S. Case No. 422/2021, subject to following conditions:-

¶21

(i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.

¶22

(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2278 of 2022(3) dt.18-07-2022 3/3

¶24

cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself.

¶25

(iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

¶26

witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

¶27

for cancellation of bail.

¶28

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶29

amitkumar/-

¶30

U T

Sundaram Chaudhary @ 4G v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sundaram Chaudhary @ 4G v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra Ray @ Surendra Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Ravindra Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Sharvan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Aman Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Dilip Das Vs The State of Bihar