Allowed

Parmanand Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Jan 2022CR. MISC./22529/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An oral order granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner, a PDS licensee, in connection with an FIR for offences under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The court directed release upon surrender or arrest within six weeks, subject to bond and surety terms.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail within six weeks of arrest or surrender, upon furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Parmanand Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22529 of 2021

¶3

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2020 Thana- AKILPUR District- Saran

¶4

======================================================

¶5

PARMANAND SINGH, S/o Bishundeo Rai Resident of Village- Bishunpur, P.S.- Akilpur, District- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhananjaya Nath Tiwari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.APP

¶12

======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 13-01-2022

¶15

Heard Mr. N. K. Agrawal, learned Senior

¶16

Advocate for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶17

The petitioner, who is a PDS dealer, seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Akilpur P. S. Case No. 29 of 2020, instituted for the offence under

¶18

Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

¶19

For not having kept the display board in front of

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22529 of 2021(2) dt.13-01-2022 2/3

¶21

the shop and the registers updated, the subject FIR has been lodged against the petitioner.

¶22

The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner

¶23

has submitted that the accusation is false. The customers present in the shop have not lodged any complaint with respect to their not having received the quota of the subsidized foodgrains. There is no compliant in the past also of any one of the beneficiaries attached to the shop of the petitioner.

¶24

The petitioner is a licensee since 2016.

¶25

Regard being had to the afore-stated facts, the

¶26

petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge XIII, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Akilpur P. S. Case No. 29 of 2020, subject to the

¶27

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22529 of 2021(2) dt.13-01-2022 3/3

¶28

conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶29

This petition stands allowed.

¶30

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶31

skm/-

¶32

U T

Parmanand Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parmanand Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aman Kumar @ Golu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sk. Najbul Vs The State of Bihar

Shyam Babu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Bali Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Budhni Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Kamli Devi @ Kamla Devi Vs the State of Bihar